One way to hold this word: draw your family tree, then draw a wedding ring around two of the names. Every line inside the ring was made by a wedding, not by birth. A -in-law is a man who ends up standing where a would stand on that tree — same generation as you, close enough to sit at the family table — but the line that put him there is a marriage. The word never says whose marriage it was. That is why the same three cover your wife's , your sister's husband, and the man who married your wife's sister, and why speakers so often add one short sentence afterwards to say which line they mean.

可以想成一張家族樹:有些線是血緣畫的,有些線是婚禮畫的。brother-in-law 站的位置就是「兄弟」那一格,年紀同輩、坐同一桌吃飯,但把他放進去的是一場婚禮,不是同一對父母。這個字只說「同輩、男性、因婚姻而來」,從來不說是誰的婚禮,所以配偶的兄弟、姊妹的先生、連襟,全部共用這一個字。中文相反,大伯、小叔、舅子、姊夫、妹夫、連襟,一開口就把線路標死了。學這個字的重點,不只是背意思,而是習慣英文的作法:先用 brother-in-law 把人歸位,再補一句說明是哪一條線。

From the word’s history

Middle English brother-in-lawe: brother plus -in-law, literally a brother by law rather than by birth. The -in-law part is exactly what the modern core image keeps: the line on the family tree was drawn by a marriage.

中古英文寫作 brother-in-lawe,就是 brother 加上 -in-law,字面上是「法律上的兄弟」。今天的核心畫面留下的正是 -in-law 這半邊:家族樹上那條線是婚禮畫的,不是血緣畫的。同一組還有 mother-in-law、son-in-law。

Wiktionary, entry 'brother-in-law' (kaikki:3f6f69a190036ae4:115795817:159412): 'From Middle English brother-in-lawe; equivalent to brother + -in-law.'

登入就可以看每一支怎麼連回核心畫面。