A helpful picture is a person standing with no strings on them. Something moves them from the inside — they want it — and nothing outside is pulling. That is what the two words say when you read them apart: will is the wanting, and free is the no-strings part. Once you can see the strings, both uses fall out of the same picture: asking whether anyone tied this particular choice today, and asking the larger question of whether there are strings on us at all.

可以想成一個人站在那裡,身上沒有綁任何線。推動他的力量是從裡面來的——他自己想——外面沒有東西在拉。把這兩個字拆開看就是這個意思:will 是「想要」,free 是「沒有被綁住」。一旦你看得見那些線,兩個用法就都從同一張圖出來了:一個是問「這一次是誰拉你來的嗎」,一個是問更大的問題——我們身上到底有沒有線。

From the word’s history

Wiktionary records free will in Middle English as fre will, fre wil, fre wille — the same two words, already joined. Read literally that is 'unbound wanting', which is exactly the no-strings picture both modern uses still rest on.

Wiktionary 記到中古英文就已經寫成 fre will、fre wil、fre wille,兩個字那時候就在一起了。字面直翻就是「沒有被綁住的意願」,剛好就是今天兩個用法都還靠著的那張「沒有線」的圖。

Wiktionary entry for 'free will', etymology_text supplied in this packet: 'From Middle English fre will, fre wil, fre wille.'