You can picture ablaze as one thing wrapped in fire from end to end. Not a corner catching, not a single small flame, but the whole surface giving off light and heat at once, so that anyone looking from a distance sees it glowing. Everything the word does grows out of that one wide, burning picture: first real fire, then anything that looks like it, then anything that feels like it.

「ablaze」可以想成一個東西整個被火光罩住的樣子。不是角落燒起來一點,也不是一朵小火苗。是整片表面同時發光發熱,遠遠看過去就是一團亮。這個字的每一種用法,都可以想成從這張畫面長出來:先是真的在燒,再來是看起來像在燒,最後是感覺起來像在燒。

From the word’s history

Wiktionary analyses ablaze as a- (on, in) + blaze (flame), literally in flame. That matches the way the word behaves today: it names a state something is in, so it sits after be or set rather than in front of a noun.

Wiktionary 把 ablaze 拆成 a-(在…之中)加上 blaze(火焰),字面就是「在火焰裡」。這和它今天的行為對得上:它講的是一個東西「處在什麼狀態」,所以放在 be、set 後面,而不是放在名詞前面。

Wiktionary entry for ablaze, kaikki extract kaikki:3f6f69a190036ae4:11897538:20393 (etymology: a- + blaze)

登入就可以看每一支怎麼連回核心畫面。